My heart is heavy today. I feel virtually alone (except for my husband) in our mission to help the children. I know that is not totally true, but today it feels that way. I think it is because my adult kids are telling me that people think that we are so crazy that we scare them away from our family - and more particularly - from helping our family manage so many children. And the truth is, we really do need some help to keep our heads above water at times. And sometimes, I just need a break and can't get one - either physically or emotionally. And that is hard. And lonely.
I feel like I'm just exercising self-pity and that I need to stop whining and keep working because in the scheme of our little, privileged American lives, we are just fine. We call them First World Problems. That's what I tell my children when they are whining that life is hard. But today, I'm going to indulge myself, at least until I finish writing.
I don't cry often, especially not while typing on my computer in a public place. So when I do, everyone knows that I have reached my emotional limits. And they usually pay attention. Because I can't fake cry.
So now I have to consider whether there are other factors influencing my tears. Like the fact that I went to visit the parents of a 20-year-old that was killed in a car accident on Tuesday, and she was in the same room, in the exact same spot where I had to view Heather's body for the first and only time after she died. I cried for them. And I cried for me.
So maybe that was part of it, but my tears are for so much more than that. I hurt for the hurting children, even my birth children who are overwhelmed by the needs of so many. I hurt. And I want to help, but I know that I can't do it alone. But I feel so alone.
Let me see if I can explain why I feel so overwhelmed by the hurt of others...
There are about 408,000 foster children in the
United States. The system is designed to be a temporary solution to a problem,
giving parents approximately 12-15 months to regroup, accept help, and regain
custody of their children.
During this time and after, someone must be a
guardian of the children. If not the parent or another willing family member or person,
then the state social service agency is mandated to take on that role on behalf
of the child. When the state is the mandated guardian, children are placed into
the foster care system.
For a large percentage of foster children, the sad truth is that they will never go home. However, by the time parental rights are finally
terminated on the children who do not go home, many have been moved from
placement to placement and are emotionally unstable, or are simply "too old"
for most families considering adoption. (Old in adoption terms is as young as 3-years-old. Too old is about 6 to 8- years-old.) As a result, these children may continue to move
from placement to placement until they age-out of the state system. And
for those older children fortunate enough to be adopted, statistics show that
about 25% of those adoptions will disrupt or dissolve, placing the child back
into the social service system.
Permanency in some setting is the only hope. For 17 years, our family has been willing and ready to accept financial responsibility and take on the parental role, when
the birth parents can’t and the state isn’t the best long-term solution. We do that through long-term foster care placement, legal guardianship and adoption, depending on what best fits the situation.
NOTE: Legal guardianship has been our solution for 11 of our kids. It is simple, but also
expensive because there is no state stipend. And it is not necessarily appropriate in every situation. In other words,
this isn’t a substitute for adoption – which is ideal but not always possible.
This is a substitute for children that might otherwise linger in foster
care, and it is a way for to prevent our foster children’s children from
entering the foster care system in the first place.
So what difference does permanency make?
Almost without exception, no matter how bad
things are at home, children in foster care want to be reunited with their
birth families. This does not mean that they liked their situation. It
does not mean that they wanted to be abused or neglected. It doesn’t mean anything
except that they have lost what should be the most significant relationship in
their childhood. And that is a terrible loss for anyone – especially a
fragile child.
Unfortunately, placement in a foster home or in a
group facility or even a psychiatric institution (which is an option for rebellious teens or those for whom there is no other placement) doesn’t magically solve the problems at home, nor does it
make a child feel safe and secure.
Quite the contrary. Being uprooted from
everything that is familiar and moved into a new family group – even if it is a
loving, warm, safe place with happy people that welcome and want the new child
– doesn’t negate the feelings of loss and abandonment these children feel.
Add to that the undeniable feelings that they don’t
quite fit in. And that they are forced to form new
relationships. Eat new food. Be exposed to new ideas. Change
schools. Lose friends. And so much more.
Even if everything is good. It is still
unbelievably hard. And the truth is, it isn’t always good.
Making matters worse is the loss of siblings.
Although most social service agencies prefer to put siblings together, the
truth is siblings are often separated because homes are not available for
multiple children, or because a large number of foster families do not want
older school-age children because they tend to have more challenging
issues. This means that a group of siblings with an older child may be
dispersed to different homes, perhaps even in different counties – leaving the
older children in group placements or institutions.
And teen mom’s, who are foster children
themselves, frequently find that their own children are placed into foster care
because the teen mom has limited family, financial and emotional
resources. So the cycle continues.
Not exactly ideal, is it? Now imagine
having to endure that life-altering change repeatedly. Without warning. Imagine being
moved after a month, just when you don't wake up every hour with nightmares, and you never see that family again. And then again 6 months later. And then again. And repeating this process over and
over again until the child is 18-years-old, when he usually leaves the system
to fend for himself.
Can we honestly say these children are better off
than they would have been in their own birth family? The issues may be
different, but the emotional trauma caused by a lack of permanency may never be
erased.
Permanency is almost always the first step in
establishing stability, which still takes years to achieve. In the
interim, the problems caused by the original abuse and neglect must be managed, as does grieving the loss of the birth family, and
adjusting to each new placement. There must be a starting point for
recovery from all this trauma.
So what if we could change that for at least some
of the children? What if some of these children were taken in by families
willing to make permanent commitments to these kids, either through adoption, or as long-term foster children
or legal guardians – knowing that these children may never be legally adoptable. And what if that family was committed to keeping sibling groups together,
taking older children – even with problems, and giving them all permanency?
To create the permanency you must have someone
willing to accept full financial and personal responsibility. And therein lies the problem. None of this is easy and many people don't like hard. Or worse, they start but don't endure the tough route. And that makes me very sad.
I asked one of my young adult children who has
been part of our family for over 10 years, how she felt about her situation now
that she is an adult. Her answer tells the whole story.
“Even though ya’ll gave me permanency and I’ve
had stability for a over 10 years, I’m just now able to start dealing with my
past, which still bites me in the butt! Ya’ll have continued to support
me emotionally and financially – even giving me health insurance and helping me
get into college. You would allow me to move back home if I needed
to. Without all of that, I would be S.O.L. (So outta luck!)
When I was growing up, I always hoped I would get
to go back home. I even left ya’ll and tried a group home to see if it
would be better. But ya’ll took me back. If you hadn’t, I would have
stayed in the group home until I was 18 and I would have felt lost and alone,
thinking I had no one. I want a different life for myself than my birth
family, who has never been able to help me. Without this family, I would still
be trying to find out who to turn to for help, for insurance, for advice, for
stability, for love and for a place to call home.
I totally get what she is saying. Early on we were simply her long-term foster
parents. And life with this child wasn’t smooth and easy just because we
offered her permanency. She hated
us for a time, which is why she voluntarily left our home for a group home. And
as much as we hated her leaving, we knew she needed to explore her options. If
we left the option open and she chose to come back home, it felt better for all
of us.
She is well into adulthood. Life has been challenging. But now that she knows that we will be
by her side. That we are her
forever family and she can still be in relationship with her birth family without depending on them. Now that she is sure she can make
lots of mistakes and we will still love her. Only now is she ready to dig deeply into her past and try to resolve those
issues. Without permanency, she
would more likely be repeating the cycle of her parents – not learning and
growing and helping others.
So I'm sad because the problem is so huge and we are so small and so inefficient and so ill-equipped and so flawed. And there aren't enough other people willing to accept this tremendous responsibility - as evidenced by 135,000 kids who are currently available and waiting for adoption in the United States. And there aren't even enough willing people to help the people that do accept the responsibility. And today, I'm not only sad, but I'm also mad.
Guilt can't call you into this mission. In fact, I tell anyone considering this that if they are not called, then it will be short term because there are a thousand reasons to quit every day. But if you are called, you cannot quit. And that is our position.
So, although we are all called by God to take care of the orphans, we don't do a very good job. And that makes me cry.